The US Department of Justice admitted in US Supreme court case 07-5674, that the IRS was criminally converting names and creating a 15 USC Section 44 unincorporated corporation, and they were using that 15 USC Section 44 unincorporated corporation to facilitate the theft of property. They also admitted that a US citizen is a fictitious entity, which is why they spell the name in all block capital letters, because at common law a proper name is NEVER spelled in all block capital letters.
You can expect that the members of the US Congress know all about this, and use it to their advantage. Why do you think that they elected a guy born in Africa to the office of President? It is because there is no such thing as a US citizen, therefore, the constitutional requirement that the president be born in the United States is impossible to fulfill….
Corporations are not born.
Update:
ThinkMasa says: Read the accompanying comment by our reader named “Taco”.
Tags: name in all caps
Not true. The US Spurpeme Court refused to hear the case you mention — Winningham v. U.S. — so the Solicitor General never filed anything and there was never any argument before the court. The Court of Appeals denied the appeal when it was before them. It does not appear that the United States filed anything there either. The US District Court in Phoenix dismissed the case very early on. The information you are probably getting is what was filed by Glenn Winningham — a person who believes he is a soverign nation and not subject to taxation — in his pleadings to the different courts.
Wow Taco, I’m impressed! We will contact our source for this story and pass on your input. This could become very interesting.
Taco do you have any facts or evidence to support your statement? Look at the definition of the All CAPS NAME in the UCC, the IRS’s own IRM and blacks law dictionary. Also, why spell your name differently from the way you use it. It seems like you are a product of your surroundings.
the word is PERSON, Taco. Do you have any facts or evidence that Glen Winningham is a PERSON or INDIVIDUAL?
when you get mail from internal revenue service and it is in all capa tell them this is not me,i am not a coroporation,i am not a fiction,i dont live in a zone,i dont live live in metro,i am not a strawman,i dont live in democracy,i live in republic ,i am child of god,i dont take part in sustainable development,i am not a former fetus,i have not made real money
ThinkMasa, please THINK and do a little research before posting such unadulterated Patriot Mythology (another term for BullShouts). You have no idea how much harm you do by posting unvetted stories like that. And Taco, THANK YOU for doing a little research.
Don’t worry, others fell for the same scam, posted here:
http://www.fourwinds10.com/sit.....1259699884
You can debunk the story by going to JUSTIA’s supreme court site:
http://dockets.justia.com/dock.....id-178508/
Check out the definitions of 15 USC 44 here:
http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/15/2/I/44
Huntsville AL attorney Larry Becraft has debunked patriot myths for years. See his comments on the ALL CAPS nonsense here:
http://home.hiwaay.net/~becraft/NamesInCaps.htm
Most of all, note this: NOBODY GETS REMEDY WITH THAT IDIOTIC ARGUMENT about the all caps name, and related myths. Even if it had merit (which it does not), only a fool would float the argument in court because the judge will then think of the floater as an idiot and react accordingly.
I find that when people call others “fools” for having a belief that is different…
Or when they punch up their rhetoric with gaping generalizations such as “unadulterated Patriot Mythology”
I begin to smell a propagandist pretending to be a commentator.
You missed the point entirely.
The article doesn’t claim that “REMEDY” can be obtained based on the all caps argument.
But thank you for your comments and I did check out the links you sent!
All caps names are dead in law legal fictions..Larry has never disputed that…The Bible tells me to not associate nor conspire with the dead..Can I be compelled by the Larry’s of the world to violate my faith?? I am not a person of any kind as I am a man….The law only applies to commercial activity!
TITLE 15 > CHAPTER 22 > SUBCHAPTER III > § 1127
Prev | Next
§ 1127. Construction and definitions; intent of chapter
How Current is This?
In the construction of this chapter, unless the contrary is plainly apparent from the context—
The United States includes and embraces all territory which is under its jurisdiction and control.
The word “commerce” means all commerce which may lawfully be regulated by Congress.
The term “principal register” refers to the register provided for by sections 1051 to 1072 of this title, and the term “supplemental register” refers to the register provided for by sections 1091 to 1096 of this title.
The term “person” and any other word or term used to designate the applicant or other entitled to a benefit or privilege or rendered liable under the provisions of this chapter includes a juristic person as well as a natural person. The term “juristic person” includes a firm, corporation, union, association, or other organization capable of suing and being sued in a court of law.
The term “person” also includes the United States, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any individual, firm, or corporation acting for the United States and with the authorization and consent of the United States. The United States, any agency or instrumentality thereof, and any individual, firm, or corporation acting for the United States and with the authorization and consent of the United States, shall be subject to the provisions of this chapter in the same manner and to the same extent as any nongovernmental entity.
The term “person” also includes any State, any instrumentality of a State, and any officer or employee of a State or instrumentality of a State acting in his or her official capacity. Any State, and any such instrumentality, officer, or employee, shall be subject to the provisions of this chapter in the same manner and to the same extent as any nongovernmental entity.
The terms “applicant” and “registrant” embrace the legal representatives, predecessors, successors and assigns of such applicant or registrant.
The term “Director” means the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
The term “related company” means any person whose use of a mark is controlled by the owner of the mark with respect to the nature and quality of the goods or services on or in connection with which the mark is used.
The terms “trade name” and “commercial name” mean any name used by a person to identify his or her business or vocation.
The term “trademark” includes any word, name, symbol, or device, or any combination thereof—
(1) used by a person, or
(2) which a person has a bona fide intention to use in commerce and applies to register on the principal register established by this chapter,
to identify and distinguish his or her goods, including a unique product, from those manufactured or sold by others and to indicate the source of the goods, even if that source is unknown.
The term “service mark” means any word, name, symbol, or device, or any combination thereof—
(1) used by a person, or
(2) which a person has a bona fide intention to use in commerce and applies to register on the principal register established by this chapter,
to identify and distinguish the services of one person, including a unique service, from the services of others and to indicate the source of the services, even if that source is unknown. Titles, character names, and other distinctive features of radio or television programs may be registered as service marks notwithstanding that they, or the programs, may advertise the goods of the sponsor.
The term “certification mark” means any word, name, symbol, or device, or any combination thereof—
(1) used by a person other than its owner, or
(2) which its owner has a bona fide intention to permit a person other than the owner to use in commerce and files an application to register on the principal register established by this chapter,
to certify regional or other origin, material, mode of manufacture, quality, accuracy, or other characteristics of such person’s goods or services or that the work or labor on the goods or services was performed by members of a union or other organization.
The term “collective mark” means a trademark or service mark—
(1) used by the members of a cooperative, an association, or other collective group or organization, or
(2) which such cooperative, association, or other collective group or organization has a bona fide intention to use in commerce and applies to register on the principal register established by this chapter,
and includes marks indicating membership in a union, an association, or other organization.
The term “mark” includes any trademark, service mark, collective mark, or certification mark.
The term “use in commerce” means the bona fide use of a mark in the ordinary course of trade, and not made merely to reserve a right in a mark. For purposes of this chapter, a mark shall be deemed to be in use in commerce—
(1) on goods when—
(A) it is placed in any manner on the goods or their containers or the displays associated therewith or on the tags or labels affixed thereto, or if the nature of the goods makes such placement impracticable, then on documents associated with the goods or their sale, and
(B) the goods are sold or transported in commerce, and
(2) on services when it is used or displayed in the sale or advertising of services and the services are rendered in commerce, or the services are rendered in more than one State or in the United States and a foreign country and the person rendering the services is engaged in commerce in connection with the services.
A mark shall be deemed to be “abandoned” if either of the following occurs:
(1) When its use has been discontinued with intent not to resume such use. Intent not to resume may be inferred from circumstances. Nonuse for 3 consecutive years shall be prima facie evidence of abandonment. “Use” of a mark means the bona fide use of such mark made in the ordinary course of trade, and not made merely to reserve a right in a mark.
(2) When any course of conduct of the owner, including acts of omission as well as commission, causes the mark to become the generic name for the goods or services on or in connection with which it is used or otherwise to lose its significance as a mark. Purchaser motivation shall not be a test for determining abandonment under this paragraph.
The term “dilution” means the lessening of the capacity of a famous mark to identify and distinguish goods or services, regardless of the presence or absence of—
(1) competition between the owner of the famous mark and other parties, or
(2) likelihood of confusion, mistake, or deception.
The term “colorable imitation” includes any mark which so resembles a registered mark as to be likely to cause confusion or mistake or to deceive.
The term “registered mark” means a mark registered in the United States Patent and Trademark Office under this chapter or under the Act of March 3, 1881, or the Act of February 20, 1905, or the Act of March 19, 1920. The phrase “marks registered in the Patent and Trademark Office” means registered marks.
The term “Act of March 3, 1881”, “Act of February 20, 1905”, or “Act of March 19, 1920”, means the respective Act as amended.
A “counterfeit” is a spurious mark which is identical with, or substantially indistinguishable from, a registered mark.
The term “domain name” means any alphanumeric designation which is registered with or assigned by any domain name registrar, domain name registry, or other domain name registration authority as part of an electronic address on the Internet.
The term “Internet” has the meaning given that term in section 230 (f)(1) of title 47.
Words used in the singular include the plural and vice versa.
The intent of this chapter is to regulate commerce within the control of Congress by making actionable the deceptive and misleading use of marks in such commerce; to protect registered marks used in such commerce from interference by State, or territorial legislation; to protect persons engaged in such commerce against unfair competition; to prevent fraud and deception in such commerce by the use of reproductions, copies, counterfeits, or colorable imitations of registered marks; and to provide rights and remedies stipulated by treaties and conventions respecting trademarks, trade names, and unfair competition entered into between the United States and foreign nations.
Search this title:
Bob Hurt you must be hurt to rely on websites and the internet for knowledge. Larry Becraft is an fool that goes into court half cocked. People there are no right or wrongs here just truth and half truth. THE CAPS NAME statement is the worse possible claim you can make in court because the same court has to protect the system in which it was established.Thank you, Think Masa, for seeing the truth and facts.
“Thank you, Think Masa, for seeing the truth and facts.”
You’re Welcome.
Editor’s Note: I have recently used the all caps argument in court but not for the purpose of remedy. Let’s face it, there are many false leads regarding “law”. However, this site contains links to two very good sources that have proven themselves over time. If one is willing to learn MANY “angles” then you proceed into court equipped to handle whatever spontaneously happens. There is no magic bullet (such as all caps). You must immerse yourself in the available literature and handle the discomfort of feeling like you’re drowning for awhile. Eventually, it all starts to become understandable. Penetrating corruption and formulating a powerful response is not easy, otherwise everybody would be doing it.
Perfect ThinkMasa, most people and persons do not understand that the law and legal are two different things. The system is meant to confuse you in this way so you can give up your rights, claim that you are helpless and in need of a attorney to handle your matters in commerce. Again thank you, ThinkMasa
Proper and improper nouns were taught in the third grade. Nouns that are in ALL CAPS fits the description of being improper, therefore if you are in proper person WHY are you showing up in court????
Actually, I haven’t shown up in court since Richard S. Wiley was unable to verify his jurisdiction.